In the article, "Dissecting the Role of Oxytocin in the Formation and Loss of Social Relationships" discusses the role of oxytocin in the formation and preservation of social relationships. In the article, it was suggested that oxytocin helps create relationships whether infant-parent or romantic, and the loss of those relationships can causes mental disorders, suggesting that oxytocin helps with mental health stability.
In the article, was also suggested that oxytocin drives the mom to care for the infant, based on a study with rats. Oxytocin concentrations during the first trimester also help predict postpartum attachment to their children. There is evidence to suggest that there is a link between childhood attachment bonds and genetic variation in oxytocin pathways. For example, mothers with a silent G to A allele in the oxytocin gene, showed lower levels of sensitive parenting. However, oxytocin levels were measured in adult women with a history of childhood trauma and abuse, as well as, socially deprived children indicating that childhood distress has a long-lasting impact on oxytocin signaling. Furthermore, it was implicated that the molecule is responsible for the social connections of dogs regarding their owners. Also males who were dosed with synthetic oxytocin were found to have an increase in attachment security, making fathers more motivated toward their young. In addition, oxytocin was shown to heighten orgasms in males. The article goes on and on about the effects on oxytocin and synthetic oxytocin, only to conclude that it plays a vital part in bonding, and more research needs to be done, but also how in smaller trials there was limited success, especially in older people.
The article was clearly interesting; but somewhat scattered and needing focus, especially in linking the conclusions to other parts of the paper. However, I want to know what kind of abuse the women they viewed endured or the children in order to alter oxytocin levels? How the oxytocin pathways works in those cases? What kind of measurements were done? I also think that the article needed to include how oxytocin affected women's orgasms, not just men's orgasms. (Because if mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy, right?)
http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.shsu.edu/science/article/pii/S0006322315004369
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/275795.php?page=2
This would explain why some people seem to go crazy after a breakup! The song "mama's broken heart" comes to mind.
ReplyDeleteI like that you link to the peer-reviewed article rather than just ScienceDaily, or another media site. One of the nice things about such a linkage is at the end of the article there are links to many of the papers that are cited, in case your curiosity gets the best of you. Nice post.
ReplyDeleteDo you think people who are considered loners have low oxytocin levels?
ReplyDeleteSo I guess if you have a dead-beat baby-daddy, just slip him some oxytocin and maybe he'll be around more!
ReplyDeleteI wonder a similar consideration as Michael. How do low levels of oxytocin impact both men and women? Also, there are women who just don't have that nurturing affection so how does that correlate with oxytocin levels. In regards to your orgasm comment, I'm sure there are studies out there there measure the amount of oxytocin during orgasms for both and men and women. What would be interesting to see if there is a difference between the levels amongst men and women. Just a thought....
ReplyDelete